CRA_DR_Blue_V2.0.jpg
Intelicrunch_Banner_Header.jpg

State AGs Send Warning To Nationwide CRAs And Furnishers Regarding FCRA Enforcement


Twenty-one state attorneys general and the District of Columbia attorney general have sent a letter to the three nationwide consumer reporting agencies (CRAs) “to remind them” of their legal obligations under federal and state law as well as under agreements between the AGs and the CRAs entered into in 2015.

The letter appears intended to serve as a warning to the CRAs that they should not take comfort from the CFPB’s “recent announcement suggest[ing] that it will not enforce the FCRA’s 30- or 45-day deadline to investigate consumer disputes requirements during the COVID-19 crisis.” The AGs reference the April 13 letter that they sent to CFPB Director Kraninger asking the CFPB to immediately withdraw its guidance regarding credit reporting during the COVID-19 pandemic and “resum[e] vigorous oversight of consumer reporting agencies and enforcement of the FCRA.” The CFPB stated in the guidance that it “will consider a consumer reporting agency’s or furnisher’s individual circumstances and does not intend to cite in an examination or bring an enforcement action against a consumer reporting agency or furnisher making good faith efforts to investigate disputes as quickly as possible, even if dispute investigations take longer than the statutory framework.”

In their letter to Director Kraninger, as they do in their letter to the CRAs, the AGs mischaracterize the CFPB’s statement in the guidance, claiming that the CFPB suggested it will no longer take enforcement or supervisory actions against CRAs for failing to investigate consumer disputes in a timely fashion. Their letter to the CRAs also mischaracterizes Director Kraninger’s response to their April 13 letter as not giving any assurances regarding the CFPB’s intent to enforce the FCRA’s dispute investigation deadlines. In fact, Director Kraninger specifically refuted the AGs’ characterization of the CFPB’s statement and indicated that while the Bureau will consider an entity’s good faith compliance efforts, it “will not hesitate to take public enforcement action when appropriate against companies or individuals that violate FCRA or any other law under our jurisdiction.” FULL ARTICLE

© 2020  InteliCrunch.com

InteliCrunch is a free service provided by a collective of people who monitor the background screening industry and how events affect not only the people in it, but even more importantly, the real human impact the industry has on today's society.*All third party logos and / or images used on this website are the sole property and / or registered trademarks of their respective companies or copyright holders. Use of these logos, images or likenesses does not, in any way, imply the endorsement of InteliCrunch by any of the businesses, brands or individuals represented, their parent companies, officers, employees, partners, or affiliates. Any such usage is for informational / news purposes only.  Any / all articles, announcements, releases or third-party-authored content is / are linked back to the original "source"  and author credit given  Furthermore, InteliCrunch is not responsible for, and does not warrant the safety of any third-party links or sites to which any viewer may be directed from InteliCrunch.  InteliCrunch has made reasonable efforts to ensure that any news or informational links on the site are from "known and reputable"  sources / websites.