Compliance News Flash - May 2020 #1

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP is pleased to provide you with the Compliance News Flash, which includes current news briefs relevant to background screening, immigration and data privacy, for the benefit and interest of our clients as well as employers and consumer reporting agencies generally.

  • At the request of the Senate Appropriations Committee, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) submitted a report to Congress updating lawmakers on its efforts to educate consumers about their rights to dispute and correct errors in their credit reports. According to the report, the two main ways the FTC promotes credit report accuracy are education and enforcement. The FTC educates consumers and businesses by posting various resources online. On the enforcement side, the report states, the FTC has brought more than 30 actions in the last decade enforcing the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) against consumer reporting agencies, users, and furnishers. Approximately half of those cases involved allegations related to processes for handling consumer disputes of inaccurate information or procedures for ensuring the accuracy of information in consumer reports. Click here to access the FTC report.

  • A new ballot initiative in California, the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), would amend and expand the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). The CPRA, sometimes referred to as “CCPA 2.0,” is sponsored by Californians for Consumer Privacy, the same activist group behind the original ballot initiative that led to the CCPA. The CPRA has secured over 900,000 signatures qualifying it for inclusion on the November 2020 ballot in California. The CPRA would establish a new category of “sensitive personal information;” expand data breach liability to include the compromise of a consumer’s email address in combination with a password or security question and answer; grant consumers a right to request correction of inaccurate personal information held by businesses; strengthen the opt-in requirement; increase the penalty for the sale or sharing of children’s data; and establish the California Privacy Protection Agency to handle enforcement instead of the California Attorney General’s Office. If it passes, the million dollar question is—will this override the CCPA. That’s an open question. Click here to read more. FULL ARTICLE

© 2020

InteliCrunch is a free service provided by a collective of people who monitor the background screening industry and how events affect not only the people in it, but even more importantly, the real human impact the industry has on today's society.*All third party logos and / or images used on this website are the sole property and / or registered trademarks of their respective companies or copyright holders. Use of these logos, images or likenesses does not, in any way, imply the endorsement of InteliCrunch by any of the businesses, brands or individuals represented, their parent companies, officers, employees, partners, or affiliates. Any such usage is for informational / news purposes only.  Any / all articles, announcements, releases or third-party-authored content is / are linked back to the original "source"  and author credit given  Furthermore, InteliCrunch is not responsible for, and does not warrant the safety of any third-party links or sites to which any viewer may be directed from InteliCrunch.  InteliCrunch has made reasonable efforts to ensure that any news or informational links on the site are from "known and reputable"  sources / websites.